Gould v. Travelers Insurance Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The question presented upon these appeals is whether the proceeds of two life insurance policies were subject to the provisions of certain trust agreements, or whether plaintiff (insured’s widow) was entitled to such proceeds outright. The facts have been stipulated by the parties.
Concededly plaintiff was originally named the sole beneficiary of both policies. Certain negotiations were carried on by correspondence between the insured, who then resided in Seattle, *547Washington, and the insurance company, which had its main office in Hartford, Connecticut. The purpose of these negotiations was to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In re the Submission of Controversy under Sections 546 & 547 of the Civil Practice Act between Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Rothstone v. NortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Rothstone v. NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Van Wirt Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of CrossmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LloydDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1961