Legal Opinion

In Re Scott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Calendar 46,317PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Virginia Ann Scott, petitioner, seeks a writ of habeas corpus and the ancillary writ of certiorari to review what she claims was an illegal conviction of contempt of court by the Honorable Frank G. Schemanske, a judge of the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit, also referred to as respondent.

Petitioner and Haroldine Cucchi, both 18 years of age, were informed against for larceny of a wallet in the city of Detroit. Petitioner pleaded guilty to a lesser charge but later was called as a prosecution witness at the trial of her alleged accomplice. The record reveals that during the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brenner v. KolkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In Re Contempt of DoughertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cross Co. v. UAW Local No. 155Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In Re Contempt of RobertsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API