Legal Opinion

Sees v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The plaintiff, administratrix of her deceased husband, Nevin B. Sees, has recovered on a policy of accident insurance. The main defense relied upon was suicide. A partial defense predicated upon change of occupation was also interposed.

Reversal is sought upon the grounds that the verdict upon the issues tendered by the jury was against the weight of evidence, and because of alleged prejudicial errors committed in the exclusion of competent and material evidence relating to the main issue of suicide.

Whether death was due to accident or deliberate and intentional suicide presented a close…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. National Benefit SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Herschkowitz v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  3. Sobischek-Robinson v. Supreme Council of Royal ArcanumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  2. Horan v. John F. Trommer, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API