Legal Opinion

(PC) Rood v. Department of Corrections

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 16, 2024No. 1:19-cv-01517Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COLTON JAMES ROOD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01517-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 N. KEOVILAY-SEE and SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, (Doc. No. 90) 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Defendants N. Keovilay-See and Scott Frauenheim’s motion 20 for summary judgment filed April 8, 2024. (Doc. No. 90, “MSJ”). Plaintiff did not file any 21 opposition. (See docket). For the reasons discussed below,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API