Wells v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
The defendants Clarence E. Wells and Reginald H. Rolsal appeal the Superior Court’s denial of their motions to withdraw their guilty pleas to charges of first degree robbery. This Court must decide whether the Trial Judge, in taking th.e defendants’ guilty pleas, committed reversible error by not explaining to them the full range of possible sentences.
I
At their original arraignment for first degree robbery, the defendants entered pleas of not guilty. Thereafter, after consulting with their attorney, the defendants entered guilty pleas in the Superior Court. Although…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Shoemaker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- State v. InsleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- State v. CastoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vittitoe v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Scarborough v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Meyer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.