Legal Opinion
Haskett v. Washington
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 4, 1968No. Civ. A. 2007-68PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The four plaintiffs in this action are appointees to the faculty of the Federal City College of the District of Columbia. 1 In due course, after confirmation by the Board of Higher Education, each plaintiff executed a contract with the school authorities and moved to Washington to assume his professional duties. Sometime thereafter plaintiffs were advised that the District Government, as a condition of paying their salaries, would require each of them to execute the standard appointment affidavit for employees of the District Government, containing certain oaths. Claiming that the underlying…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. WadmondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Kahn v. Secretary of Health, Education, & WelfareDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1971
- Mazhar Jalil v. Robert E. Hampton, Chairman United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Stewart v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- Thalberg v. Board of Trustees of the UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.