Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Globe Indemnity Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1925No. Appeal 118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The plaintiff’s action was brought on a contract of insurance against burglary drawn to cover a lot of household goods stored by the plaintiff in a room or apartment in the Cuneo Storage Warehouse in the City of New York. When the owner removed her property from the premises, it was discovered that a part of it was missing. The verdict represents the value of the lost articles. A part of the policy contains the following: “It is hereby understood and agreed that the insurance granted by this policy attaches and applies exclusively for direct loss by burglary of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Miller v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
  4. People v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Axe v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Levine v. Accident & Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  3. Dzurko v. Pilot Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Weller v. Grange Mutual Casualty Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Gold v. Commercial Casualty InsurancePennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API