Hubbard v. Globe Indemnity Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The plaintiff’s action was brought on a contract of insurance against burglary drawn to cover a lot of household goods stored by the plaintiff in a room or apartment in the Cuneo Storage Warehouse in the City of New York. When the owner removed her property from the premises, it was discovered that a part of it was missing. The verdict represents the value of the lost articles. A part of the policy contains the following: “It is hereby understood and agreed that the insurance granted by this policy attaches and applies exclusively for direct loss by burglary of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Miller v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
- People v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Axe v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Levine v. Accident & Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
- Dzurko v. Pilot Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Weller v. Grange Mutual Casualty Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Gold v. Commercial Casualty InsurancePennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1936