Legal Opinion

Gold v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County

Decided February 4, 1936No. 778Published

1Opinion of the Court

Glass, J.,

This is an action on a residence theft policy of insurance tried by a judge without a jury. On January 6, 1933, defendant, Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, issued to Morris Gold, now deceased, its policy of insurance no. BT21455, in the sum of $1,000, insuring him to the amount of $500 thereof for loss by burglary, robbery, theft or larceny of, inter alia, “watches . . . precious and semi-precious stones, jewelry . . . owned by the Assured, or by any permanent member of the household of the Assured, who does not pay *562board or rent,” for the term of one year beginning January…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Brams v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Geo. Home Ins. v. Kinnier's adm'xSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  4. Forest City Insurance v. HardestyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Miller v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API