Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Rafter H Constr., LLC v. Big-D Constr. Corp.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided October 24, 2018No. Case No. 4:16-cv-00401-DCNPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David C. Nye, U.S. District Court Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs/Relators, Rafter H Construction, LLC, and Neal Hikida's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. Dkt. 15. Having reviewed the record and briefs, the Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented. Accordingly, in the interest of avoiding further delay, and because the Court finds that the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument, the Court will decide the Motion without oral argument. Dist. Idaho Loc. Civ. R. 7.1(d)(2)(ii). For the reasons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States of America, Ex Rel., Paul Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNeil v. JollyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  2. Weiss v. United Seating and Mobility LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API