Webber v. Ward
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: E. N. AustiN, Judge. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Cassoday, O. J.
The complaint alleges, in effect, that October 16, 1890, Horace N. Campbell was duly appointed the guardian of the person and estate of the plaintiff, Harry J. Webber; that thereupon Campbell duly qualified-as such guardian; that September 6, 1892, at Wau-kesha, the defendant, maliciously intending to injure the plaintiff in his good reputation, and without any probable cause, procured the plaintiff to be arrested and imprisoned; that October 4, 1892, the district attorney dismissed ,the prosecution and found Webber not guilty of the offense charged. At the opening of the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Cornish v. TuttleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Murray v. McGarigleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Moir v. DodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Wood v. Union Gospel Church Building Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Plath v. BraunsdorffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meyer v. BarthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Joint School District No. 1 v. Wisconsin Rapids Education Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Hill v. American Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Green v. Appleton Woolen MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Hughes v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.