Legal Opinion

German-American Bank v. Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant Charles W. Mayer from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 2d day of April, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the New York Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The defendant H. P. Mills made and executed his promissory note, bearing date March 4, 1903, whereby on demand to the order of the defendant Charles W. Mayer he promised to pay the sum of $5,203.95. After the execution and delivery of the note Mayer duly indorsed the same to the plaintiff for value and it became the owner and holder thereof. On the 10th of July, 1903, four months and six days after-the date of the note, the plaintiff caused the same to be duly presented for payment and payment thereof was refused and the same was thereupon duly pretested for non-payment and a *313notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. German-American Bank v. . AtwaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. McLean v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. McLean v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murray v. Third Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Berman-Steinberg, Inc. v. Standard Cotton Stores, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  3. Candee, Smith & Howland Co. v. Bendish Contracting Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  4. Finch v. DevanneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API