Legal Opinion
Berman-Steinberg, Inc. v. Standard Cotton Stores, Inc.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 24, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
La Fetra, Ch. J.
This is a motion to strike out the answer of the defendants and for judgment against them under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for the reason the answer is sham and frivolous and interposed solely for delay. A cross-motion is made by the defendants to dismiss the second and third causes of action on the ground that the allegations therein do not set forth facts sufficient to constitute causes of action.
The action is by the plaintiff against the defendants Standard Cotton Stores, Inc., the maker, Hyman Singer, the president of the maker, and one Abraham Cohen, as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seneca County Bank v. . NeassNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- German-American Bank v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Kelly v. TheissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Life & Accident Ins. v. VarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Stagg Tool & Die Corp. v. WeismanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Candee, Smith & Howland Co. v. Bendish Contracting Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933