Legal Opinion
Deehan v. Unum Group
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided August 1, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00880Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION William Deehan, ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No.: 3:22-cv-00880-JMC ) v. ) ) ORDER AND OPINION Unum Group and Colonial Life & Accident ) Insurance Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) This matter is before the court pursuant to William Deehan’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 4.) For the following reasons, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 4), DENIES his request for attorney’s fees, and REMANDS this case to the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.