Legal Opinion
Jackson v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 25, 2003No. 02 C 3057PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Vendetta Jackson (“Jackson”) has sued the City of Chicago (“City”), for which she previously worked as a police officer, under Title II 1 of the Americans with Dis abilities Act (“ADA,” 42 U.S.C. § 12132 2 ) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act,” Section 794(a)). Jackson’s Complaint asserts that City has violated ADA by (1) refusing to complete the processing of Jackson’s request for reinstatement at her job (Comply 41), (2) having a policy that forces officers to pay for the medical examinations they must complete…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harding v. CIANBRO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- CULVER v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARTINSVILLEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022