Legal Opinion

Rawlins v. Honolulu Soap Works Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

*263Opinion of the Court, by

Pbeab, J.

The plaintiff declares upon a contract made January 6, 1893, whereby he agreed “in consideration of the amount below specified to be paid to him,” to work for the defendant, a corporation, “ as a soap-boiler for the term below set forth, and to give his whole time, skill and experience to the business of said company [the defendant]; and to conduct the business of soap-making in a skillful and proper manner and to the satisfaction of the said company, and to properly care for the apparatus and effects of the company intrusted to his charge, and to oversee and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Duplex Safety Boiler Co. v. . GardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  4. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H. Hackfeld & Co. v. GrossmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In re MacfarlaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Porter v. Hawaiian Pork Packing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API