Legal Opinion

Honadle v. University of Vermont & State Agricultural College

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided June 1, 1999No. 2:96CV292PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF ■ ■ LAW

SESSIONS, District Judge.

In this lawsuit alleging reverse racial discrimination in a failure-to-hire case, the parties seek a ruling in limine on two issues: 1) whether Plaintiff Beth Walter Honadle would be entitled to instatement in the position she sought should she prevail on her discrimination claims; and 2) whether, if the jury concludes that race was a factor in the hiring decision, Defendant University of Vermont (“UVM”) may argue that it acted pursuant to a valid affirmative action plan. An evidentiary hearing was conducted on July 7 through…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weser v. GlenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  2. Berkley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Byrne v. Yale University, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  4. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 99OAG088, Maryland Attorney General Reports2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API