Legal Opinion

Odgers v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided March 10, 2009No. GDTC-AA-08-133-TBWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

WILSON, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the final decision of the Defendant, Office of the Director of Regulation (ODR) revoking his gaming license. The notice of hearing concerning the revocation specified that it was based on his arrest for possession of marijuana and motor vehicle charges. The revocation was based upon a violation of the casino’s drug-free policy. Because the fact of an arrest alone cannot be grounds for a revocation of a license; because the notice did not allege a violation of a drug-free policy; and because there was no evidence in the record of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pineiro v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1999
  3. Dodge v. NakaiDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1969
  4. Culley v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
  5. Church v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API