Legal Opinion

Hogue v. Dreeszen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1955No. 33788PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This action was brought to enjoin the construction of a building which the plaintiffs contend was being carried out in violation of restrictive covenants. Issues were made and trial was had. The trial court held that the building being constructed was not in violation of the restriction and that the restriction was valid and binding.

Plaintiffs are owners of property adjoining that of defendants. ' They appeal from a denial of relief. Defendants appeal from the decree insofar as it holds the restriction to be valid and binding. We affirm the judgment of the court holding the restriction to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Library Neighborhood Ass'n v. GoosenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Wright v. PfrimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rose v. Kenneseth Israel CongregationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Dundee Realty Co. v. NicholsNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boyles v. HausmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pool v. DenbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Reed v. WilliamsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. DeBoer v. Oakbrook Home Ass'n, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Western Land Co. v. TruskolaskiNevada Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API