Ritter v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 112, Jan. T., 1897, by-defendant, front judgment of C. P. Lehigh Co., April T., 1896,. No. 98, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit upon a policy of accident insurance.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 112, Jan. T., 1897, by-defendant, front judgment of C. P. Lehigh Co., April T., 1896,. No. 98, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit upon a policy of accident insurance. Before Al-bright, P. J. At the trial it appeared that the policy in suit contained the-following clause: “ (1) In the sum of $25 per week against loss of time, not ■ exceeding 52 consecutive weeks, resulting from bodily injuries-incurred as aforesaid other than such as result in the loss of one- or both hands, feet or eyes, which shall, independently of all other • causes, immediately, wholly and continuously…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
This case was carefully and correctly tried. We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications of error; nor do we think that any of them . requires special notice.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by8 opinions
- United States Casualty Co. v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Tennant v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Farner v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Bova v. Wyman Chemical Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, McKean County1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.