Legal Opinion
Aggregate Industries v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 10, 2016No. 14-1252; Consolidated with 14-1276PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge:
The evidentiary background of this case is complicated. The law is not. Aggregate Industries transferred work from one bargaining unit to another over the objections of the union representing both units. An administrative law judge found that because the company had bargained over the issue to impasse, it was entitled to make the change unilaterally. The National Labor Relations Board disagreed. Aggregate Indus., 359 N.L.R.B. No. 156, at 4 (July 8, 2013) (Board opinion). 1 The Board held that the company had not merely transferred work; it had changed the scope…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. CanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brent Electric Company v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Island Architectural Woodwork, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Communication Workers of Am. v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Communication Workers of Am. v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Island Architectural Woodwork, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.