Legal Opinion

Richards v. Meissner

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided March 8, 1906No. 2,954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On application for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

The restraining ord'er .granted .herein by another judge, in practice is‘so perfunctory in character as to entitle it to little weight when the defendants appear to show cause against *110its further continuance. It is essentially ex parte; made without notice, to the adverse party. Such restraining orders are often, and perhaps too often, issued by judges when so pressed with other matters that they have not the time to consider, with even little care, the questions of fact and law presented, feeling assured that little harm can come to the defendant in the few days…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Bernardin v. NorthallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
  4. Illingworth v. AthaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1890
  5. Wheaton v. KendallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Myers v. Arkansas & Ozarks Railway CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
  2. City Sanitation Co. v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Richards v. MeissnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API