Legal Opinion

Wood v. Kaufman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1903No. Docket No. 246PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Assumpsit by James O. Wood, administrator de bonis non of the estate of Joseph Pope, deceased, against George Kaufman and Fred Kaufman, for money had and received. From a judgment against defendant George Kaufman, he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

This cause was tried by the court without a jury, resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff against George Kaufman, and is here upon a finding of fact and law by writ of error taken by the defendant George Kaufman. In substance, the finding shows that the defendant sold to the plaintiff’s intestate, Pope, a horse, buggy, and harness for $350, $175 of which was paid to his son (who made the sale) at the time of pur*6chase; that such sale was a conditional one, the title to remain in defendant George Kaufman, and the property to be kept in defendant’s barn, until paid for. Pope died, and after his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preston v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Davis v. StrobridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Ryan v. WaysonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frame v. PlumbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Music City, Inc. v. Estate of DuncanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Beddingfield v. Central Bank of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Locklund v. Burman's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. Wormer Machinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API