Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Haberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for professional malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated June 28, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The defendant moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that the cause of action may not be maintained because of the applicable Statute of Limitations. In his reply affirmation the defendant first raised…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLearn v. Cowen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Mitchell v. MendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nehmadi v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Villatoro v. TaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Stock v. MorizzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Varo, Inc. v. Alvis PLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API