Legal Opinion

City of Wichita Falls v. Norman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1998No. 2-97-162-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARDS, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment based on the assertion of official and sovereign immunity. 1 The assertion of immunity was made by the city of Wichita Falls (“the City”) on behalf of its employee, Officer Russell Melvin (“Melvin”), in response to a lawsuit filed by Sherry Norman (“Norman”) and her husband. In five points, the City argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment because (1) Norman’s claim is barred by official and sovereign immunity; (2) all elements of official immunity were…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Terrell Ex Rel. Estate of Terrell v. Sisk, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  2. Harless v. Niles, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  3. Enriquez v. Khouri, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  4. Rivas v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Greenwell v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API