Legal Opinion

American Strawboard Co. v. Foust

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1895No. 1,411PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Reinhakd, J. —

This is an action for damages for a personal injury received by the appellee while in the employment of the appellant.

The complaint avers, in substance, that the defendant, a corporation, at the times hereinafter mentioned, was engaged in the business of manufacturing strawboard at its'; factory near Noblesville; that the plaintiff was twenty-one years old in July, 1893; that in September of the same year he came to Noblesville, from Missouri to find employment; that he was employed by the defendant company about three weeks after he came to Noblesville, to work at the cutting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Nappanee v. RuckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Consolidated Stone Co. v. RedmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CozattIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. South Bend Brick Co. v. GollerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API