Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Cozatt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1906No. 5,658PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom Morgan Circuit Court; Joseph W. Williams, Judge. Action by Charles E. Cozatt against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Erom a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $5,000, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, P. J.

Appellee recovered a judgment below against appellant for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by its negligence. The complaint is in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer was overruled. Answer in denial. Trial by jury, and with their general verdict they found specially as to specific "facts by their answers to interrogatories. Appellant’s motions for a new trial and for judgment in its favor upon the interrogatories were overruled.

Overruling the demurrer to the complaint, the motion for a new trial, and the motion for judgment on the answers to the interrogatories…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gregory v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. CharmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. CongdonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Knouff v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. American Car & Foundry Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KranzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Jordan v. East St. Louis Connecting Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Columbia Creosoting Co. v. Beard AdministratorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API