Legal Opinion

Munn v. Horvitz Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1964No. Nos. 37905 and 37906Published

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The first issue for decision is the extent of liability, if any, which the defendants may have incurred by reason of installing the 72-inch storm sewer for collecting the additional surface water runoff in the Deer Creek watershed and causing it to flow upon lower lands. Although an upper-land owner cannot lawfully increase the burden on lower lands by collecting surface water and discharging it directly on such lands in larger quantities or at points other than those established by natural drainage, it is well settled that he can, without incurring liability, channel his surface water into a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ratcliffe v. Indian Hill Acres, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Bey v. Wright Place, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. McCoy v. RankinOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Oakwood Club v. South Euclid CityOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Persin v. YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API