Legal Opinion

Westall v. . Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1940Published

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

It is admitted in the record that defendant filed a petition in bankruptcy after the execution of the note in controversy. and that he was duly discharged, and the plaintiff testified that he had actual knowledge of the proceedings in bankruptcy. Thus the questions presented are clearly defined: (1) May the plaintiff now maintain an action on the note? (2) Is the plaintiff's cause of action bottomed upon the promise to pay made after petition in bankruptcy and, if so, is it barred by the statute of limitations duly pleaded by the defendant ?

A provable claim is released by the order of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Shapley v. . AbbottNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Federal National Bank v. KoppelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Fraley v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API