Legal Opinion

Monsch v. Pellissier

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1922No. L. A. No. 6488PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los. Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

SHURTLEFF,. J.

The amended complaint alleged that defendant kept and maintained for her own use and benefit an area or vault under the sidewalk in front of and adjoin ing her property in the city of Los Angeles; that in the sidewalk over and above said area or vault defendant kept and maintained light-wells consisting of iron grating and inlaid glass for her sole and exclusive use and benefit, for the purpose of supplying light to said vault and area and to the basement of her building standing upon her said property; that said light-wells were maintained by defendant in a negligent and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Barry v. TerkildsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Martinovich v. WooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Spence v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Ho SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sexton v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. HostetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Granucci v. ClaasenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Salt Lake City v. SchubachUtah Supreme Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API