Blome v. Wahl-Henius Institute of Fermentology
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit. Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. William L. Pond, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Chytraus
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiffs seek to recover payment in this action, under the contract involved, without a certificate from the architect, the issuance of which their contract specifically provides shall be prerequisite to payment being due. The first and second counts of plaintiffs’ declaration are predicated upon the contract and full performance thereof. The third and fourth counts are predicated upon other contracts and performance^ thereof, involving, respectively, work and material for $66 and $63.84. The declaration contains no other…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Goddard v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- McAuley v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Perry v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- City of Lake View v. MacRitchieIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edward Edinger Co. v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Melchior v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1953