Legal Opinion

Smith v. the Warwick Zoning Board of Review, Kc 95-378 (1997)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 23, 1997No. C.A. No. KC 95-378, KC 96-229Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before this court are plaintiffs' motions for attorney's fees in the above-captioned cases. In Bailey v. The Warwick ZoningBoard of Review, KC 96-229, plaintiffs move for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), G.L. 1956 § 42-92-1, et seq, for their successful appeal to Superior Court reversing the Warwick Zoning Board of Review's (Board) denial of a dimensional variance. Additionally, plaintiffs seek the balance of their attorney's fees pursuant to the court's inherent powers to fashion a remedy. In Smith v. The WarwickZoning Board of Review, KC 95-378,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kaya v. PartingtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. State v. DelaurierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Hassell v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  4. Taft v. PareSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  5. Hillside Associates v. StravatoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API