Legal Opinion

Newmark Grain Co. v. Merchs. Nat'l Bank of L.A.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1913No. L.A. No. 3146PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Kuster, Loeb & Loeb, and Hunsaker & Britt, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

There were eighty-nine causes of action, six of which were dismissed by the court below. Findings were waived in four others, the seventy-seventh, eightieth, eighty-first, and eighty-fourth. The eighty-sixth and eighty-eighth causes of action are covered by the same findings which are applicable to the first seventy-five causes. The eighty-ninth cause of action is a common count for money had and received, and it refers to the same moneys sued for in the other parts of the complaint. We will therefore…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Columbia Mill Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Plumas County Bank v. Bank of Rideout, Smith & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First National Bank of MonroviaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Bank of Ukiah v. MohrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. of New York v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. In Re RuskayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Mathey v. Central National Bank of Junction CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Gonyer v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Cabrera v. Thannhauser & Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API