Pearson v. Board of Selectmen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
This appeal concerns the applicability of G. L. c. 39, §§ 23A and 23B, the open meeting law, to a nonpublic meeting attended by the chairman of the board of selectmen of Longmeadow, officials of the city of Springfield, and others. A judge of the Superior Court, after a jury-waived trial, held that there was no violation of c. 39 by reason of the chairman’s attendance. We affirm the judgment.
The facts found by the trial judge, supplemented in minor details by uncontroverted testimony, are as follows. In the spring of 1996, the city announced plans to reopen a part of Forest Park known as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks, Lodge No. 65 v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Tolar v. School Bd. of Liberty CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Wilson v. San Francisco Municipal RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCrea v. FlahertyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Allen v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Amos v. Town of WestfordMiddlesex County Superior Court · 2016
- Kilcoyne v. Wayland Landfill Review PanelMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
- Walters v. Boston City CouncilDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023