Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reed v. Lincoln

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 16, 1999No. 98-1410Published

1DissentW. Sharp, J.

I would affirm the trial court’s determination that all sums due under the promissory note are barred by the five year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. The facts in this case are not in dispute. The issue is the interpretation of the legally “amateur” promissory note employed by the parties in this case.

The printed form of the note provides (in part): “The maker and endorser of this note further agree to waive demand, notice of non-payment and protest....” The principal sum due is $28,000.00, payable in monthly installments of $304.85, for 223 consecutive months, including…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baader v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Jacobs v. Automotive Repair Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Cook v. MerrifieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Fischer v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Miller v. BalcanoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API