Legal Opinion

Scott v. Hamm, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 14, 2023No. 2:23-cv-02003Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS NORRIS SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-2003-JWB HAMM, INC., d/b/a HAMM COMPANIES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on Defendant’s partial motion to dismiss. (Doc. 5.) The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. (Docs. 6, 10, 13.) Defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART for the reasons stated herein. I. Facts The following facts are taken from Plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff Norris Scott is an African American male who was first employed by Defendant HAMM, Inc., in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African-American Owned MediaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API