Legal Opinion

Dean v. Dean

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1905Published

Motion for counsel fees in an action for a divorce.

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The motion for counsel fees to enable the defendant to defend this case must be granted. The general rule is that where the wife denies on oath the charge of adultery, she will be allowed counsel fees, even though the husband submits affidavits in support of the charge, as so important a question should not be determined on conflicting affidavits (Israel v. Israel, 28 Misc. Rep. 57; Rublinsky v. Rublinsky, 24 N. Y. Supp. 920; Frickel v. Frickel, 4 Misc. Rep. 382), unless it clearly appears beyond a reasonable doubt, that the ultimate success of the husband in the litigation is inevitable.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. The People v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. North v. NorthNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hammond v. HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Frickel v. FrickelThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API