Legal Opinion

Southfork Ranch v. Bunn CA2/6

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 2020No. B279391MUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 12/16/20 Southfork Ranch v. Bunn CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX SOUTHFORK RANCH, LLC, 2d Civ. No. B279391 et al., (Cons. w/ No. B280994) (Super. Ct. No. 56-2014- Plaintiffs, Appellants…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API