Legal Opinion

People v. Saunders

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 31, 1989No. 2-87-0728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis

Defendant, James Saunders, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Winnebago County which dismissed his amended petition for post-conviction relief: On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing on his petition given that he alleged that (1) a recent evidentiary discovery showed that the State used unreliable scientific evidence at his trial; and (2) the absence of black persons from the jury venire deprived him of his right to be tried by a jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community. We affirm.

In January 1982, defendant was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. People v. SilagyIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PeeplesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API