Legal Opinion
Caroline E. Strickland, and Arthur Charlton and Joyce Healy v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 15, 1999No. 99-5019, 99-5026PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
DECISION
This is an appeal from an order of the United States Court of Federal Claims granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Appellants’ suit was time-barred. See Strickland v. United States, 42 Fed.Cl. 41 (1998). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the Court of Federal Claims erred in granting summary judgment and we reverse and remand.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
This case represents the clear and repetitious intent of the United States Congress to resolve a pernicious land issue that has taken five generations to bring to a conclusion.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robert O. Mudge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Banner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In re Teles AG InformationstechnologienCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Richardson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.