Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2002No. 20010271Published

1DissentMaring, Justice

[¶ 44] Because I am of the opinion the Bureau must prove a violation of N.D.C.C. § 65-05-33 by clear and convincing evidence, I respectfully dissent.

I

[¶ 45] The sections of N.D.C.C. § 65-05-33, pertinent to this case provide:

1. A person who claims benefits or payment for services under this title or the employer of a person who claims benefits or payments for services is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if the person or employer does any one or more of the following:

a. Willfully files a false claim or makes a false statement in an attempt to secure payment of benefits or payment for services.

b.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Bank of Kenmare v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API