Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentMaring, Justice
[¶ 44] Because I am of the opinion the Bureau must prove a violation of N.D.C.C. § 65-05-33 by clear and convincing evidence, I respectfully dissent.
I
[¶ 45] The sections of N.D.C.C. § 65-05-33, pertinent to this case provide:
1. A person who claims benefits or payment for services under this title or the employer of a person who claims benefits or payments for services is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if the person or employer does any one or more of the following:
a. Willfully files a false claim or makes a false statement in an attempt to secure payment of benefits or payment for services.
b.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State Bank of Kenmare v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.