Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Gardner
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided May 31, 1994No. CV-89-485-JLQPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
QUACKENBUSH, Chief Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Ct.Rec. 22), heard without oral argument on May 23, 1994. Plaintiff did not appear; Defendants were represented by Martin E. Wyekoff. Having reviewed the record, and being fully advised in this matter, the court hereby grants Defendants’ motion.
Defendants, Former Governor Booth Gardner and WSP Superintendent Lawrence Kincheloe, have moved for summary judgment against inmate David Castillo believing that they are entitled to qualified immunity from damages resulting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Tribble v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Giangrasso v. Butler (In Re Giangrasso)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.