Legal Opinion

Baackes v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided January 3, 2014No. 1:12-CV-583 (FJS/RFT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

SCULLIN, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 4, 2012, Plaintiff filed his initial complaint against Defendants. See Dkt. No. 1. On June 4, 2012, he filed an amended complaint, in which he asserted the following eight claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”): (1) Defendants had no basis in the Plan or documents that justified their denial of his lump sum benefit; (2) Defendants could not change their initial rationale for denial of benefits; (3) even if Defendants could change their initial rationale, the documents on which they…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeCesare v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Halo v. Yale Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API