United States ex rel. Papaioanu v. Messick
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
The petitioner is charged with income tax evasion as defined by § 145(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 145 (b). At the Commissioner’s hearing he de- , termined probable. cause had been shown. The accused was taken into custody. From the order of commitment petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus. ‘
The charge is petitioner was guilty of income tax evasion for the year 1943. During that year, he participated as equal partner in the operation óf a hotel business in Rehoboth, Delaware, and also operated a liquor store at Lewes, Delaware, from March 8, 1943, to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Cleugh v. StrakoschCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Ex parte JonesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1899
- United States v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. PapaioanuDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1950