Legal Opinion

Lindberg v. Mutual National Bank of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 22, 1943No. Gen. No. 42,265Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

September 10, 1941, Freda Lindberg, as conservatrix of the estate of Harry Lindberg, insane, filed her verified complaint in equity against defendant, The Mutual National Bank of Chicago, praying that two collateral notes executed by Harry Lindberg May 17 and May 27, 1941, be declared null and void and the collateral, given to secure the payment of the notes, returned to plaintiff. Defendant filed a verified an- . swer and afterward plaintiff moved for a summary judgment supported by an affidavit. Defendant filed an affidavit in opposition to plaintiff’s motion. The court disposed of the case…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. American Bible Society v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Langdon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Mutual Life Insurance v. WiswellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. Lilly v. WaggonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API