Legal Opinion

Strong v. Omaha Construction Industry Pension Plan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2005No. S-03-1403PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Before his death, William David Strong participated in the Omaha Construction Industry Pension Plan (Plan), an employee benefit plan subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (1994) (ERISA). When William joined the Plan, he designated his wife, Melissa Strong, as his beneficiary for the Plan’s pension death benefit. Although Melissa and William divorced in 1998, William did not remove Melissa as his beneficiary before his death. The district court determined that under the divorce decree, Melissa waived her interest and granted summary…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund v. Laurine Brown (Lamar), and Dessie Brown, and All UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Clarke v. First Nat. Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Andres v. McNeil Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Loher v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. SentersNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API