Legal Opinion

Cross v. Ainsworth Seed Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 9, 1990No. 4-89-0607PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for claims alleging primarily products liability and negligence of defendants in designing, assembling, installing, or constructing a conveyer-belt system which resulted in personal injury to plaintiff.

After extensive discovery, defendants filed motions for summary judgment asserting the statute of repose of section 13—214(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) as an affirmative defense. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 13—214(b).) The trial court granted defendants’ motions and entered judgment in favor of defendants and against…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Skinner v. Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mullis v. Southern Co. Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. WetzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. McCormick v. Columbus Conveyer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Calumet County Club v. Roberts EnviRonmental Control Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hernon v. E.W. Corrigan Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Hernon v. EW Corrigan Const. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Zimmer v. Village of WillowbrookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. W.E. Erickson Construction, Inc. v. Chicago Title InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API