Legal Opinion

Hampton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1973No. 57625PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Commissioner.

Appeal (taken prior to January 1, 1972) from denial, after evidentiary hearing, of motion under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., to vacate and set aside judgments of conviction and sentences to seven years’ imprisonment, entered upon pleas of guilty to charges of robbery, first degree, by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon, and assault with intent to kill with malice aforethought.

The transcript shows the following:

Walter L. Brady, Jr., a lawyer of some sixteen years’ experience specializing in criminal trial practice, was appointed to represent Robert Hampton in the spring of…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. State v. NylonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. CHRISTOPHER ALLEN BORNEMAN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Mark T. McCloskey v. State of Missouri, Sheriff Vernon Betts, and Mayor Tishaura JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State of Missouri v. Jason RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API