Legal Opinion
Jenrette v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 2, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 68-881PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.
The third-party defendant Penn-Central Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as Penn-Central), added as a third-party defendant by a prior order of this Court, has moved to set aside service of process in this action. It contends it is not amenable to service or subject to personal jurisdiction within South Carolina. I agree.
The defendant Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company (hereinafter called Seaboard), at whose instance Penn-Central was brought in as a third-party defendant, concedes in its brief that, “Under the statutes that existed and under the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bonnie Lee Jamieson Deveny, B.N.F. Frank Jamieson, and Frank Jamieson v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, Robertshaw Fulton Controls CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Joseph M. Shealy, Jr. v. Challenger Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Jake Harold Bowman, Philip G. Griffin, A. Donald Brinton and Midland Industries, Inc. v. Curt G. Joa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Friedr. Zoellner (New York) Corporation v. Tex Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- St. Clair v. RighterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. M/V Santa Clara IDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1994