Legal Opinion

Washington Water Power Co. v. Kootenai County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1921No. 3546PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On petition for modification of opinion.

1Per curiam

In the opinion filed we assume that tender made by the appellant was sufficient in amount to cover the taxes which should have been paid by the appellant, if the board of equalization had proceded consistently with relation to the valuation put upon other like property, and that therefore no penalty was recoverable, notwithstanding our opinion that under the statutes of Idaho one liable to pay taxes, and who makes a tender of an amount insufficient to cover the amount of the taxes lawfully assessed, is liable for all penalties and interest upon any sum found to be due. We adhere to that view…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rixey's Executors v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Spencer v. Babylon R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Power v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Siegal v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. McCaw Keating v. Tax Com'r FaseHawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pearson, Collector of Taxes v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API