Legal Opinion

Row, Peterson Co. v. Marrs

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1925No. 4399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Relator seeks a mandamus against respondent to require him to do and perform the ministerial or statutory duties which it has a legal right to have performed in regard to its contract with the State of Texas for the purchase of certain textbooks, to-wit: Fourth Reader, Fifth Reader, and Sixth Reader, each by Free and Treadwell, and Seventh Reader, by Briggs.

The facts of this case case in all essential particulars are the same as those contained and stated in the case of Laidlaw Brothers, Inc., v. S.M.N. Marrs, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, opinion delivered June 8, 1925, with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Decker v. KirlicksTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Charles Scribner's Sons v. S.M.N. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pitts v. ElslerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Long v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Laidlaw Bros. v. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Am. Book Co. v. Marrs, Supt.Texas Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API